A note about eventual consistency - Part 1
Revisiting a massively misunderstood topic

Recently I saw a skeet on Bluesky:
Revisiting a massively misunderstood topic
Recently I saw a skeet on Bluesky:
Hedging our options and moving on
In the previous post, we completed our analysis of the projection Steve made by looking at some unresolved side effects and questions that would come with such a future.
Side effect and unresolved questions
In the previous post, we looked at the likely short- and mid-term consequences if Steve’s projection should become reality. We saw a bit disturbed that most likely the only winners of that projection would be the providers of agentic AI solutions and their investors while everyone else would be on the loser side of the game.
Short- and mid-term consequences
In the previous post, we looked at the want side regarding Steve’s projection and the forces they trigger. We took off the rose-colored glasses and tried to have an unembellished look at these forces even if the things we saw, were a bit more gloomy and controversial than we would have liked it.
The real forces that drive markets and decision makers
In the previous post, we looked at Steve Yegge’s post where he made a projection from the vibe coding of today to controlling AI agent fleets in the near future that take over all coding reliably. Pondering this projection as a possible future, we realized that this future is not what we need as our actual problems in software development do not lie in a lack of developer productivity (or to be more precise: developer efficiency) but…